Connect with us

Reviews

Acer Predator Z35P monitor review

First things first, let’s address the elephant in the room: the Acer Predator Z35P is enormous, heavy, and extremely expensive. Kind of like an elephant, actually.

Published

on

Acer Predator Z35P monitor review

First things first, let’s address the elephant in the room: the Acer Predator Z35P is enormous, heavy, and extremely expensive. Kind of like an elephant, actually.

To put that in a little context, here’s the Predator Z35P standing next to my 43″ Sony telly, a 960mm wide unit in a more standard flat panel/16:9 widescreen configuration, and also a banana for scale:

Acer Predator Z35P size comparison vs TV and banana

To be a little more precise, the Predator Z35P is 845mm (33.25″) wide, weighs just over 12.5kg (27.6lbs) and has an RRP of £999.99 (US MSRP $1099.99). The banana, for reference, is fair trade and measures 160mm from tip to tip, not including the curve.

That all seems like a lot, but to be fair to Acer, you do get a lot of monitor included in the – also stupidly massive – box.

For starters, the Acer Predator Z35P has a curved 35″ ultrawide-QHD (3440×1440) 21:9 Vertical Alignment panel, with LED back-lighting, a 4ms response time, and Nvidia’s G-Sync technology built in. It also features a standard 100Hz refresh rate, with a contrast ratio of 2,500:1 and a brightness of 300Nit.

It also features dual stereo speakers – a relative rarity for PC screens – that receive audio input via HDMI, and a USB connector to allow it to function as a powered USB 3.0 hub. With built-in speakers and availability of powered USB ports, there is perhaps an argument to be made for considering the Acer Predator Z35P as a television as well as a monitor – just add a Chromecast and you’re away – but at a grand’s worth of hardware, it’s probably not worth it.

You can pick up a similarly-sized (albeit not 21:9 or ultrawide) smart TV for half the price of the Predator Z35P (plus another 10% if you go curved) and you really won’t miss the ultrawide display in anything but gaming. We tried 4K Netflix on it and it was either stretched or had vertical black bars, for example.

But when you are gaming on the Predator Z35P, in all its 21:9, ultrawide glory? It’s pretty special, provided you’ve got a graphics card that can keep up with it.

That native 3440×1440 21:9 resolution is a spectacular party piece, particularly if you’re sat bang in the sweet spot in the centre of the curve. The brightness and contrast are superb, and the extra width does a remarkable job of drawing you into games, particularly ones that really make meaningful use of the extra screen real estate like Elite: Dangerous. That being said, the viewing angles are surprisingly good for a curved screen, somewhere these panels often fall down. That’s especially important if you’re going to be sharing this screen with others for watching movies and the like.

If you’re gaming with something that’s less capable of driving the Acer Predator Z35P to its full capability however – like the GTX 1050-equipped laptop we’ll be reviewing shortly – you might find the screen ratio to be more of a nuisance than a benefit, particularly on modern titles. Sure, I was fine pushing older or less-demanding titles like Half-Life 2 and The Long Dark at 4K through that meagre GPU, but more intensive games like Gears of War 4 or PUBG were a real struggle.

If your graphics card can’t handle the native resolution, there are simply no 21:9 screen ratios that we can find both the monitor and Nvidia’s settings are entirely comfortable with. More often than not, you’ll find yourself making some sort of compromise, either:

  • Playing 16:9 with the screen stretched;
  • Playing 16:9 with black borders;
  • Playing at a non-native, custom 21:9 resolution (possibly with some sort of screen scaling);
  • Or playing at that native 4K ultrawide resolution, but with all the settings turned right down to get even slightly playable frame rates (which kind of defeats the point of such a glorious 4K panel).

That’s possibly a bit of a moot point, though. Most people who are even remotely considering dropping a grand on a monitor the size of Luxembourg probably aren’t scrimping with a GTX 1050 (or lower) in their primary gaming PC. More likely, you’re going to be pairing this with something like an Nvidia GTX 1080 or AMD RX Vega 64, and if you do – and you’ve got enough room on your desk, and you don’t mind that it looks a bit like one of the Transformers – you’ll really appreciate what it can do.

Also, imagine how many columns you’ll be able to have on the screen in one Excel spreadsheet!

Recommended for you


A note from the Thumbsticks editorial team

If you like what we do and want to support free, quality games writing, then please consider supporting us via Patreon, buying us a coffee, or subscribing to our newsletter.

Tom is an itinerant freelance technology writer who found a home as an Editor with Thumbsticks. Powered by coffee, RPGs, and local co-op.