To paraphrase a Mr. W. Wonka, video games can be a world of pure imagination.
We can fight fantastical monsters amongst painterly landscapes and perform feats of aerobatic brilliance within an abstract milieu plucked straight from the mind of a madman. Or, if you’d rather, we could probably just plod through another ‘realistic’ representation of some dull, brown town and wave our guns at yet another batch of life-threatening foreigners.
You see, despite the video game medium’s potential to present virtual worlds with creative flair, a significant number of players’ still want nothing more than straight-up, graphical realism in their games. Indeed, such is the importance placed on graphical realism that any new supposedly ‘realistic’ game which does not meet expectations may be instantly regarded as a failure. Games like Battlefield, CoD and Crysis are lauded or derided based upon how realistic their smoke particles are; how naturally their lighting falls onto surfaces; how their grass sways in the breeze; or how brick-like their brick textures are. Equally, those games brave enough to adopt an alternative graphical aesthetic are often belittled and viewed as lazy, ugly or just plain wrong.
To an extent, the demand for realism may be culturally determined, specifically from male-gender expectations of masculinity. It seems as though many gamers are influenced by the need to protect a certain macho image and, consequently, there is favour for games with supposedly grown-up realism. Meanwhile, the aesthetic of cartoons is generally associated with a juvenile form of entertainment, and an affront to masculine sensibilities. Interestingly, these Western sensibilities stand in stark contrast to those in the East, where the anime is part of mainstream culture.
So, gamers’ want their experiences to be emulations and tangible reflections of real-world situations. But just how real is realism? Certainly, representation in today’s games can be so visually complex that what appears on the screen is beginning to rival the intricacies of the real world. But even with the power of the modern video games’ realistic representation of space, games still need to make use of tricks and misdirection borrowed from traditional techniques such as painting in order to fool the player into believing in an imaginary world. Thus graphical realism within video games can be described as the production of an illusion: a realistic representation of an external object when no such object is actually present. In other words, there is a significant difference between the signifier (the object in-game) and the signified (the object that is being represented). This is basic semiotics, and a concept beautifully illustrated by René Magritte in his painting, Ceci n’est pas une pipe. Essentially, irrespective of how realistic-looking an in-game object is, it is never actually, y’know, real.
Furthermore, the actions we perform within these realistic games are just as abstract and removed from reality as those we undertake whilst bouncing Mario through the stylised worlds of the Mushroom Kingdom. Whatever the Daily Mail would have us believe, operating a virtual representation of a gun by twiddling a thumb stick or guiding a mouse pointer does not suddenly make you a highly trained marksman. Sure, you can pixel-twitch better than your mates, but get a real gun in your hands and you’ll be floundering like a fish out of water. None of the attributes of a firing a real gun (from the kick-back, the weight and the muscle tension) are emulated within the video game medium. And nor should they be.
Furthermore, why on earth are we so enamoured with supposedly realistic depictions of war and weapons? There is an undeniable gun-porn culture within videogaming; we are obsessively enthralled with gleaming, metal objects and their subsequent, deadly effects upon firing. Is this all down to some Freudian-tinged desperation or the previously mentioned machismo pride? Irrespective, the greater the realism, the more we seem to enjoy shooting the shit out of each other. But it’s all a fallacy, an illusion and possibly an erroneous one at that. As a gun shop owner recently bemoaned via imgur, his establishment is continuously plagued by Call of Duty enthusiasts who presume to know everything there is to know about guns but spout forth nothing more than geysers of absolute nonsense. Ultimately, realism in games is a bit of a con.
This isn’t to suggest that the realistic aesthetic does not have its place and beneficial attributes. Certainly, realistic characters may elicit strong, empathetic emotional responses, and realistic environments might imbue your actions with a unique gravitas but, in a vast world of imaginative possibilities, the fixation upon realism is limiting a potentially boundless medium.
So, maybe it is about time we, as the consumer, opened our arms to new possibilities. Let us stop chasing the dragon of realism, and instead embrace a wider plethora of art styles and modes of representation. Let us unbridle video games from the continuous plod of realism, and permit our video games to soar through wondrous, imaginative lands.
After all, real life is boring enough already.
Image: Genée Cosden
We hate to ask, but global advertising revenues are the lowest they've ever been. It's killing the online publishing world. If you like what we do and want to support free, quality games writing, then please consider supporting us via Patreon, buying us a coffee, or subscribing to our newsletter.
Recommended for you
Hellblade dev Ninja Theory announces Project: Mara
Descenders is getting a physical release on PS4, Nintendo Switch
Xbox Game Pass adds four more games this month
Final Trials of Mana characters revealed in new trailer
The 20 most anticipated video games of 2020
Is Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot worth playing?
Valve is making Half-Life free
Temtem’s launch trailer leans hard into its influences
Support Thumbsticks on Patreon, for as low as $1 a month, and you'll get a login to a speedy, ad-free version of the site.